asp .net code protectedSource

Hi guys,

I'm having the exact same problem. i wonder how CkEditor guys didn't fixed this issue, because there is a lot of threads in different forums across the web about this.

Your help is highly appreciated..

PHP works fine. Did you try that?

Trying the php protected source configuration, pasting some PHP code into the editor and swapping it to and from source mode to see if that works. I wasn't interested in what language you were using but the config option which is a regular expression array. The way both languages are protected works in similar ways when you set the option correctly if you read the API and look at the source code to see how it works. If one works, they both should work unless either the regexp is incorrect or your ASP.NET code contains errors.

But yeah, developing in ASP.NET is for boners. Enjoy!

Thanks,
Zanpakutō

avivca wrote:Right now, I have ASP .net and we cannot use PHP.

You still do not get it.
I am not asking you to use PHP.
I am asking that you try to test if you can save PHP code using the editor without it being destroyed, using the protected source method for PHP.
Doing so does not require you to have PHP set up in any way whatsoever.
It is merely a simple test to rule out your ASP.NET code being the problem here.
PHP is irrelevant to this test because you could use anything - like instead, ruby perl or python to do the test, if you know the regexp to add to protected source.

The purpose of the test is to find the root cause of the problem because your "Guess" that it is a CKEditor problem is likely incorrect.

avivca wrote:Zanpakutō, perhaps your assistance is not appropriate here due to the coding language or maybe you have an ASP .net box to do a quick Q&A on it?

As I have explained, which you have misunderstood, language is not important. Testing the environment your editor is working in, is.

As far as testing an ASP.NET box out, a few things :
1. I wouldn't lower my standards. ASP.NET is unsuitable for forward thinking open web projects and no one who is successful on the open web uses it. Facebook, No. PHP. Twitter, No. Scala. Google, No. Java, python and possibly some perl and others.
2. Setting up ASP.NET requires a MIcrosoft server. Microsoft servers are slow, do not provide value for money, are expensive with huge upgrade software & support costs and unreliable. I am not interested in paying for that kind of software.
3. I wouldn't be able to re-create your working environment in a reliable way in order to "Test" what you see as an issue.
4. Using ASP.NET means that you are being paid to do the work you are doing because operating an ASP.NET server without there being payment involved is idiocy. So that is where my choice to try to offer you assistance ends. It looks like you need to pay a professional web developer to solve your issue unless you find someone who is willing to help you with your proprietary project for free.

Originally, I was trying to have a bit of a joke with you because most people say, "Yeah, I have to use ASP.NET, it sucks, it's what they use at work." But obviously, using it is a choice you have made instead.
Sorry to hear about that.

I strongly suggest that you pay for CKEditor support if you haven't already and seek resolution by email.
Good luck with your issue.

Thanks,
Zanpakutō

It would be really helpful if you showed what have you tried and what's exactly the problem with a proper test-case.

Aviv is right, there seems to be a problem.

Here is what I have,

In the configuration file, I've added:

config.protectedSource.push( /<\?[\s\S]*?\?>/g );   // PHP Code
config.protectedSource.push( /<%[\s\S]*?%>/g );   // ASP Code
config.protectedSource.push( /(]+>[\s|\S]*?<\/asp:[^\>]+>)|(]+\/>)/gi );   // ASP.Net Code

In source mode, I have added:

<%=Model.Vare("Temp")%>

This is what I get when I review the source again:

<!--{cke_protected}%3C%25%3DModel.Vare(%22Temp%22)%25%3E-->

Sorry, but that test is working fine for me. I don't see any difference between protecting asp or php code.