I use fckeditor in around 420 sites. We'd used fck 2.0 for years. That seemed to work fine minus a few strange quirks. Anyway, I recently updated to 2.5 Beta and now am suffering a user backlash as customers inform me that their content is being changed by the new editor. It's true that 2.5 is correcting bad existing html on save or source toggle, and in some cases, it's worse than others.
Speaking generally, is anyone else seeing old fck-formatted content being "rearranged" by 2.5?
Tom
Speaking generally, is anyone else seeing old fck-formatted content being "rearranged" by 2.5?
Tom