Nice work on 2.3 but I think it still has some bugs with the way in which it handles html tags:
Bug #1
---------
<p>Some text
<table>..code here..</table>
some more text</p>
as you can see there the <table> is inserted between the <p> tag. It does the same thing for <strong> tags
<strong>some text
<table>..code here..</table>
more text</strong>
I've also noticed that the html forms for work as
well. Switching between source and design mode the
form gets messed up. The editor will sometimes remove the form controls and place it on the outside of the <form></form> tags
Bug #2
--------
The Remove formating toolbar button does not work with styles selected from the style dropdown menu.
Feature Requests
-----------------
1) Would be nice if there was a better way to set stylesheet settings rather than using xml
2) Would be nice if we could get an advance tab for changing stylesheet, class name and other attributes on all html elements.
3) Would be nice if the forms group could get <fieldset> and <label> controls.
4) Would be nice if there were controls to insert layers (divs) with bring to front, send to back and toggle absolute/relative options.
Bug #1
---------
<p>Some text
<table>..code here..</table>
some more text</p>
as you can see there the <table> is inserted between the <p> tag. It does the same thing for <strong> tags
<strong>some text
<table>..code here..</table>
more text</strong>
I've also noticed that the html forms for work as
well. Switching between source and design mode the
form gets messed up. The editor will sometimes remove the form controls and place it on the outside of the <form></form> tags
Bug #2
--------
The Remove formating toolbar button does not work with styles selected from the style dropdown menu.
Feature Requests
-----------------
1) Would be nice if there was a better way to set stylesheet settings rather than using xml
2) Would be nice if we could get an advance tab for changing stylesheet, class name and other attributes on all html elements.
3) Would be nice if the forms group could get <fieldset> and <label> controls.
4) Would be nice if there were controls to insert layers (divs) with bring to front, send to back and toggle absolute/relative options.
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
Wow! There are lots of bugs with 2.3. This is html generated from the demo when coping and pasting <ul> list:
<p>This i</p>
<li><strong>trututut</strong> </li>
<li>e5ue5u </li>
<li>w5uwu </li>
<li>w5u5us <strong>trututut</strong>some <strong>sam</strong>
<ul>
<li><strong>trututut</strong> </li>
<li>e5ue5u </li>
<li>w5uwu </li>
<li>w5u5u </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>ple text</strong>. You are using <a href="http://www.fckeditor.net/">FCKeditor</a>.</p>
</li>
Notice the run away </li> tag and the missing <ul> tags
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
I've just updated the download page with the new packager for version 2.3:
http://www.fckeditor.net/download/
Best regards,
Frederico Caldeira Knabben
----
http://www.fckeditor.net
"Support Open Source Software... What about a donation today?"
Frederico Knabben
CKEditor Project Lead and CKSource Owner
--
Follow us on: Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | LinkedIn
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
If you have paragraph tags around a form and then paragraph tags around a form element, the 2nd set of tags inside the form will be pulled outside of the form along with the form elements contained inside them. This happens when switching to source mode and back a couple times.
Here's some sample code that was easily created in wysiwyg mode. Paste it into the editor in source mode and then toggle modes a couple times to see the horror of horrors.
<p>
<form action="test" method="post" name="test">
<p> <input name="ad" /></p>
</form>
</p>
The editor MUST preserve the form elements leaving the nested p's intact or find a way to remove the p's leaving the element intact. This must be backward compatible to preserve forms created in earlier versions where this wasn't enforced.
RE: Version 2.3 Bugs & Features
Right now FCK is faster and nicer looking than most wysiwyg but the only concern that I'm aware of is what's mentioned above.
PS. Don't know if you are working on it Fred but it would be nice to have these issues resolve first before new features.
Many thanks