CKEditor: The new domain name

ckeditor.com w/o www subdomain seems the best choice.
As Fred stated correctly, the editor is not a NPO, additionally there is a commercial license. I would heavily discourage .org
.net is inappropriate too since this is not a network whatsoever.

ckeditor.com sounds great and is quite short.

Go for .com without www!

Very off-topic but shouldn't there be a TLD for software projects? (primarily open source).

Perhaps .os, .code, .dev, something like that...

I know there aren't, I was just suggesting there should be!

There are some quite ridiculous tlds like .biz, .museum, .coop, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.aero - you'd have thought that the development community would by now have got one for themselves? Who do we need to petition?

Actually I just looked this up, and it's ICANN.

The assumption that a .com is best is just abuse of the domain name system. Here in Canada, .ca domains are prevalent. In the UK, .co.uk is very common, .au in Australia. Thinking that a .com will help you be found is bogus. CKEditor is not a commercial operation, and therefore should not automatically use .com (.commercial) for its domain name. Good search engine optimization is the best way to ensure you get the visitors that are looking for you.

Since you already have the domains, just point all three to the site and you're good to go.

If you choose not to use "www", then you should still support it for those that type it in, but then you can redirect to the non-www version.

Thanks for letting me share.

TheDO wrote:The assumption that a .com is best is just abuse of the domain name system. Here in Canada, .ca domains are prevalent. In the UK, .co.uk is very common, .au in Australia. Thinking that a .com will help you be found is bogus. CKEditor is not a commercial operation, and therefore should not automatically use .com (.commercial) for its domain name. Good search engine optimization is the best way to ensure you get the visitors that are looking for you.

Since you already have the domains, just point all three to the site and you're good to go.

If you choose not to use "www", then you should still support it for those that type it in, but then you can redirect to the non-www version.

Thanks for letting me share.